Aslam babalal desai v. state of maharashtra
WebIn Aslam Babalal Desai v/s State Of Maharashtra, (1992) 4 SCC 272, Supreme Court held that The provisions of the Code, in particular Sections 57 (person arrested not to be detained more than 24 hours) and 167 (detention, remand & default bail), manifest the legislative anxiety that once a person’s liberty has been interfered with by the ... WebSep 15, 1992 · Petitioner: Aslam Babalal Desai. Respondent: State of Maharashtra. Apeal: Criminal Appeal No. 559 of 1992 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1490 of 1992) ... After the charge-sheet was submitted and the documents were tendered subsequent thereto, the State of Maharashtra moved an application under Section 439 (2) of the Code in the …
Aslam babalal desai v. state of maharashtra
Did you know?
WebASLAM BABALAL DESAI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA(1992)In general, grounds for … WebWe would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
Web2024, Bail: Law and Practice in India , Manoj Kumar Sinha and Anurag Deep (Ed's.) WebJun 29, 2024 · In the case of Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra, the …
WebNov 24, 1994 · On 18-6-2003 an application for cancellation of bail was filed by the State of Maharashtra under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Proced...and learned Single Judge ... Aslam Babalal Desai v. State Of Maharashtra . 6. Court: Supreme Court Of India. Date: Sep 15, 1992. Cited By ... WebFeb 26, 2024 · 15 LANDMARK JUDGMENTS ON 'BAIL'. ASLAM BABALAL DESAI VS Territory OF MAHARASHTRA – (1992) By and large, the reason for bail abrogation is impedance or endeavor to meddle with the proper method of organization of Justice, or avoidance or endeavor to sidestep the course of equity or maltreatment of the freedom …
WebSep 15, 1992 · Aslam Babalal Desai vs State Of Maharashtra Judgement of Supreme …
Webthe state was allowed by the sessions court. The additional sessions judge set aside the … tmnt state of shockWebMar 29, 2001 · In this connection, reference may be made to the case of Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra. The majority judgment has held that in view of deeming provision under proviso (a) to Section 167(2), the order granting bail shall be deemed to be one under Section 437(1) or sub-section (2) or Section 439(1) and that order can be … tmnt stoolWebNov 24, 1994 · The bail once granted cannot and ought not to be normally cancelled in a mechanical manner unless there are cogent and overwhelming facts and circumstances on record to do...bail in the case of Aslam Babalal Desai v. State Of Maharashtra. (AIR 1993 SC 1).The petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved any one or more of the ... tmnt storage toteWebAug 20, 2024 · The right to bail under Section 167(2) proviso (a) thereto is absolute. It is a legislative command and court's discretion cannot supersede. At that stage, merits of the case are not to be examined to tailor the relief. A similar view was echoed in the case of Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra MANU/SC/0001/1993 : (1992) 4 SCC … tmnt story arcsWebNov 4, 2024 · 19 Aslam Babalal Desai v. S tate of Maharashtra (1992) 4 SCC 272 at 289-90 ... (1978) 2 SCC 411. Also see, Mahmood Dawood Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra. Jan 2004; 2-362; State; State (Delhi ... tmnt stranger things figuresWebThat is because cancellation of bail interferes with the liberty already secured by the accused 18 (2004) 2 SCC 362. 19 Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra (1992) 4 SCC 272 at 289-90, para 11. 20 Ibid. Also see, Nityanand Rai v. State of Bihar (2005) 4 SCC 178; Mehboob Dawood Shaikh v. tmnt storyWebJun 29, 2024 · In the case of Aslam Babalal Desai v. State of Maharashtra, the Investigating Officer had failed to file a charge sheet within a specific time period of 60 days for the further extension of the detention of the accused. The issue before the court was whether a bail can be granted under the proviso of Section 167 (2) of the Cr.P.C., and a … tmnt storage shell turtles